According to the results, the participation rate of fake news (8.7 million) was higher than that of mainstream news (7.3 million), and 17 of the 20 fake news played an advantageous role in winning the election. For instance, Buzzfeed ( ) compared and analyzed participation in 20 real news and 20 fake news articles (e.g., likes, comments, share activities) that spread the most on Facebook during the last three months of the 2016 US Presidential Election. The spread of fake news not only deceives the public, but also affects society, politics, the economy and culture. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.ĭata Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript.įunding: This research was supported by the Institute of Information & communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP) grant funded by the Korea government (584, 373).Ĭompeting interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Received: MaAccepted: NovemPublished: December 9, 2021Ĭopyright: © 2021 Kim et al. Universita degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, ITALY Citation: Kim B, Xiong A, Lee D, Han K (2021) A systematic review on fake news research through the lens of news creation and consumption: Research efforts, challenges, and future directions.
0 kommentar(er)
